다음 밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 가장 적절한 표현은?Much like in… | [국회직 9급 영어] 18년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

다음 밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 가장 적절한 표현은?
Much like in a heavy snowfall, data is piling up at a high speed and in a gigantic volume. You could think that it’s good: more data means more reliable insights. But in reality, huge volumes of data don’t necessarily mean huge volumes of actionable insights. Sometimes, the data you have―despite all the information it contains―statistically just isn’t ____________________________________________. For example, opinions on Twitter vs. opinions of the population on the whole. Let alone the bias of the former, it doesn’t even contain the viewpoints of the entire population (for example, the elderly and the introverts often get excluded). This way, you can get wrong analysis results easily. Besides that, in such ‘heavy snowfalls’, it simply gets more challenging to find what you need while eliminating the data that bears no use whatsoever.

state-of-the-art enough to find correlations with the population

the representative sample of the data you need to analyze

an impediment in your way of solving the target problem

analyzable to come to a meaningful conclusion due to sorted information

intact because some key information has already been eliminated

빈칸에는 “the representative sample of the data you need to analyze”(분석해야 할 데이터의 대표 표본)가 들어가야 한다.
뒤의 예시는 트위터 의견이 “the population on the whole”(인구 전체)의 의견과 다르며 “the elderly and the introverts”(노인과 내향적인 사람들)가 빠진다는 내용이다. 곧 데이터가 많아도 통계적으로 모집단을 대표하지 못한다는 뜻이다.
“state-of-the-art enough to find correlations with the population”: 기술의 첨단성은 지문의 쟁점이 아니다.
“an impediment in your way of solving the target problem”: “장애물이 아니다”가 되어 데이터의 한계를 지적하는 논지와 반대다.
“analyzable to come to a meaningful conclusion due to sorted information”: 정렬된 정보 때문이라는 내용은 지문에 없다.
“intact because some key information has already been eliminated”: 예시의 문제는 핵심 정보 삭제가 아니라 표본의 편향이다.