Which of the following is the most logi… | [국회직 8급 영어] 21년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

Which of the following is the most logical sequence of the three parts to complete the passage?
In contrast to a growing number of scholars in other fields, economists have contributed relatively little to recent critiques of consumer society. With a few notable exceptions, contemporary economists have been hesitant to entertain questions about the relationship of consumption to quality of life.
(A)Economists, moreover, are typically unwilling to engage in critical discussion of values and preferences. In the absence of such discussion, it is easily assumed that the existing configuration of consumer choice is optimal.
(B)Otherwise, it would not be occurring. Actually the implications of the model are even stronger, as we shall see.
(C)Their reluctance is not difficult to explain. Most economists subscribe to a model that holds that as long as standard assumptions are satisfied, consumption must be yielding welfare.

(A) - (B) - (C)

(B) - (A) - (C)

(B) - (C) - (A)

(C) - (A) - (B)

(C) - (B) - (A)

올바른 순서는 (C) - (B) - (A)이다.
제시문의 “hesitant”를 (C)의 “Their reluctance”가 받아 그 이유인 모형을 제시한다. (B)의 “Otherwise, it would not be occurring”은 (C)의 “consumption must be yielding welfare”를 이어받는다. 마지막으로 (A)가 “moreover”로 추가 이유를 덧붙인다.
(A) - (B) - (C): “moreover”가 첫 이유 없이 처음에 나올 수 없다.
(B) - (A) - (C): (B)의 “Otherwise”가 받을 내용이 앞에 없다.
(B) - (C) - (A): 역시 “Otherwise”가 (C)보다 앞서 지칭이 성립하지 않는다.
(C) - (A) - (B): (C)의 “consumption must be yielding welfare”와 이를 받는 (B)가 끊어진다.