Which of the following is the most appr… | [국회직 8급 영어] 24년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

Which of the following is the most appropriate title of the passage?
More recently, some political philosophers have claimed that when we take part in elections, we agree to comply with the government that emerges and the laws it enacts. This looks more promising: we do at least have a free choice as to whether to vote or not, and there would be no point in holding elections unless people recognized the government that emerged as legitimate. But unfortunately there still seems to be a gap between voting and registering your consent. What if you deeply disagree with both parties, but vote because you think that one is slightly less bad than the other? Or what if you think that although you have in a sense consented to the overall package of policies that the winning party has announced in its manifesto, there are a few items that you find quite repugnant ― and you had no chance to vote on these individually? Perhaps the voters’ consent can help explain why governments have legitimate authority, but not why individual citizens have an obligation to obey the law.

The Reason Why Elections Work

Discordance between Voting and Voter Consent

Inaccuracies in Policies the Government Makes

The Perfect Alignment of Consent and Obligation

The Nexus of Policies and Government Legitimacy

가장 적절한 제목은 “Discordance between Voting and Voter Consent”(투표와 유권자 동의 사이의 불일치)이다.
지문은 “there still seems to be a gap between voting and registering your consent”(투표와 동의 표시 사이에는 여전히 간극이 있다)라고 밝힌다. 차악 투표와 일부 공약 거부의 예를 들어 투표가 곧 동의는 아님을 보인다.
“The Reason Why Elections Work”: 선거의 작동 이유가 아니라 동의 이론의 한계를 다룬다.
“Inaccuracies in Policies the Government Makes”: 정책의 부정확성은 논의되지 않는다.
“The Perfect Alignment of Consent and Obligation”: 동의가 준수 의무를 설명하지 못한다는 결론과 반대된다.
“The Nexus of Policies and Government Legitimacy”: 초점은 정책과 정당성의 연결이 아니라 투표와 동의의 간극이다.