Which of the following is the most appr… | [국회직 8급 영어] 24년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

Which of the following is the most appropriate title of the passage?
Artists themselves have no role in the interpretation of art, while scientists are the only consumers with sufficient observational skill to provide science’s organized skepticism. The interpretation of art can be manifold and the artist’s intention can be to provoke a multitude of interpretations ― sometimes, the more interpretations the better. The scientist, on the other hand, must aspire to convey only one possible interpretation ― the correct interpretation. What follows from this is that clarity is an imperative in science in a way that it is not in other cultural endeavors. Where multiple interpretations are encouraged, obscurity can be a virtue but where the aspiration is to produce only one interpretation, clarity is to be preferred. Obscurity is also privacy, and privacy is an obstacle to organized skepticism. It follows, from the fact that observation and skepticism are virtues in the pursuit of knowledge about the natural world, that clarity is also a virtue. There is an irony here, since science should seek maximum clarity and accessibility even while acknowledging that the only proper assessors of a scientific claim are small elites, while artists often seek obscurity or multiple interpretations even while accepting that the proper assessors are the public.

How Scientists Analyze Art with Clear Perspectives

Scientific Analysis of Artistic Ambiguity

How Scientists Create Artistic Interpretations

Importance of Precision in Art and Science

How Art and Science Interpret Clarity and Obscurity

가장 적절한 제목은 “How Art and Science Interpret Clarity and Obscurity”(예술과 과학은 명료함과 모호함을 어떻게 해석하는가)이다.
지문은 다양한 해석을 환영하는 예술에서는 “obscurity can be a virtue”(모호함이 미덕일 수 있다)이지만, 단 하나의 올바른 해석을 추구하는 과학에서는 “clarity is an imperative”(명료함이 필수다)라고 대조한다. 명료함과 모호함에 대한 두 분야의 태도 차이가 중심이다.
“How Scientists Analyze Art with Clear Perspectives”: 과학자가 예술을 분석하는 이야기가 아니다.
“Scientific Analysis of Artistic Ambiguity”: 예술의 모호함을 과학적으로 분석한다는 내용이 없다.
“How Scientists Create Artistic Interpretations”: 과학자는 단 하나의 올바른 해석을 지향할 뿐, 예술적 해석을 만들지 않는다.
“Importance of Precision in Art and Science”: 예술에서는 오히려 모호함이 미덕일 수 있다고 하므로 맞지 않는다.