밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 가장 적절한 표현은?Obviously, the … | [국회직 9급 영어] 21년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 가장 적절한 표현은?
Obviously, the educational process for jurors needs to be improved, and judges and lawyers need to become active participants in this educational process. They need to take the responsibility for informing jurors about the relevant legal issues in each case. They must educate jurors on the rules of law applicable to the cases at hand and in language they can understand. Some may argue that this system may be abused by lawyers who want to bias a jury in their favor. This is, of course, possible. But one must realize that       . Each juror walks in with his or her own distinct set of values and beliefs. The lawyers are always trying to influence them to see their side. I would argue, however, that it is better to risk the possibility of some additional bias in order for the juries to be better informed. It is more desirable to have a knowledgeable jury, even at the risk of some bias, rather than to have a jury that is totally in the dark about the legal issues surrounding a particular case.

juries are inherently biased

juries will never change their mind

judges are always impartial

lawyers hardly succeed in persuading juries

judges are likely to dictate the court

빈칸에는 “juries are inherently biased”(배심원단은 본래 편향되어 있다)가 들어간다.
글쓴이는 변호사가 교육 제도를 악용할 수 있다는 반론을 인정한 뒤 빈칸으로 받아친다. 바로 뒤의 “his or her own distinct set of values and beliefs”(각자의 고유한 가치관과 신념)가 배심원에게 이미 편향이 있음을 뒷받침한다.
“juries will never change their mind”(절대 생각을 바꾸지 않는다)는 지문에 없고, 변호사가 영향을 주려 한다는 서술과도 어긋난다.
“judges are always impartial”(판사는 늘 공정하다)은 배심원을 논하는 문맥에서 벗어난다.
“lawyers hardly succeed in persuading juries”(변호사는 설득에 거의 성공하지 못한다)는 지문에서 다루지 않은 내용이다.
“judges are likely to dictate the court”(판사가 법정을 좌우할 것이다)는 근거가 없는 내용이다.