※밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 표현으로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오. [문17… | [국회직 9급 영어] 23년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

※밑줄 친 부분에 들어갈 표현으로 가장 적절한 것을 고르시오. [문17.∼문18.]

The problems which have preoccupied recent social anthropology are rather different to those which interested Herodotus and Tacitus. They were first formulated during the Enlightenment. Theories which attempt to resolve these problems were established at the same time. Until the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, European kings had been believed to rule by Divine Right, and human society was supposed to reproduce, on a lower scale, the Divine society of Heaven. These assumptions were questioned during the Enlightenment. Once people considered themselves free to decide for themselves __________________________ according to natural rather than divine law it became possible to ask both how actual societies might be improved, and how present societies had diverged from the natural, or original human condition. Both the European past and more exotic but living, human societies were seen as sources of information that could help answer these questions.

the truth of the assumptions underlying these social problems

what was, or was not, proper social behaviour

the socialistic kind of governmental forms

the conflicts between citizens and kings

how society was to be degenerated

빈칸에는 “what was, or was not, proper social behaviour”(무엇이 올바른 사회적 행동인가)가 들어간다.
“free to decide for themselves”의 목적어로서 “according to natural rather than divine law”(신의 법이 아닌 자연법에 따라) 판단할 대상이어야 한다. 왕권신수설이 흔들리자 사람들이 사회적 규범을 스스로 판단하게 되었다는 흐름이다.
“the truth of the assumptions underlying these social problems”: 지문에서 의심받은 것은 사회 문제의 전제가 아니라 신이 정한 사회 질서이다.
“the socialistic kind of governmental forms”: 사회주의적 정부 형태는 지문에 없다.
“the conflicts between citizens and kings”: 시민과 왕의 갈등은 스스로 결정할 대상이 아니며 지문에도 없다.
“how society was to be degenerated”: 뒤의 “how actual societies might be improved”(개선)와 방향이 반대이다.