Which of the following is the most logi… | [국회직 8급 영어] 20년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

Which of the following is the most logical sequence of the three parts to complete the passage?
First, what is politics about? One of the classic answers to this question is that politics is about who gets what, when and how. On this view, politics is essentially about settling contestation over the distribution of material goods.
(A) Yet the notion that politics is solely, or mainly, about distribution has been challenged over the past three or more decades. The increasing salience of ‘post-ideological’ contestation around values and lifestyles suggests that politics is as much, or arguably more, about identity and culture as it is about material resources.
(B) This may have been a fair characterization of politics in the post-World War II era－an era that saw the rolling out of progressive taxation and welfare provision by a relatively centralized state and a party political system based on a traditional left-right ideological cleavage.
(C) Much of our contemporary political debate revolves around issues that are not neatly categorized as left or right, such as the environment, gender and sexual rights, immigration and security.

(A)-(B)-(C)

(A)-(C)-(B)

(B)-(A)-(C)

(B)-(C)-(A)

(C)-(B)-(A)

글의 순서는 (B)-(A)-(C)이다.
(B)의 “This”가 제시문의 분배 정치관을 받아 전후 시대에는 타당했다고 평가하고, (A)의 “Yet”이 그 관점에 대한 도전을 제시한다. (C)는 (A)의 정체성·문화 쟁점을 환경·이민 등 구체적 사례로 풀어 준다.
“(A)-(B)-(C)”: (B)의 “This”가 탈이념 쟁점을 가리키게 되어 전통적 좌우 균열 설명과 맞지 않는다.
“(A)-(C)-(B)”: 현대 쟁점으로 흐른 뒤 (B)가 오면 “This”의 지칭 대상이 어긋난다.
“(B)-(C)-(A)”: (A)의 “post-ideological” 전환이 나오기 전에 (C)의 비좌우 쟁점이 먼저 나와 전개가 뒤집힌다.
“(C)-(B)-(A)”: 제시문의 분배 논의에서 바로 현대 쟁점으로 건너뛰고 (B)의 “This”도 어긋난다.