다음 글의 흐름상 어색한 문장은?People often wonder w… | [지역인재 9급 영어] 25년 1회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

다음 글의 흐름상 어색한 문장은?
People often wonder whether we could harvest electrical power
from lightning. ① On the face of it, it makes sense; after all,
lightning is electricity, and there is indeed a substantial amount
of power in a lightning strike. ② A typical lightning strike
delivers enough energy to power a residential house for about
two days. ③ That means that even the Empire State Building,
which is struck by lightning about 100 times a year, wouldn’t
be able to keep a house running all year round on lightning
power alone. ④ Wind farms are one of the major generators
of electricity. Even in regions with a lot of lightning, the
power delivered to the ground by sunlight outweighs the power
delivered by lightning by a factor of a million. Generating
power from lightning is like building a wind farm whose
blades are turned by a tornado: impractical.

On the face of it, it makes sense; after all, lightning is electricity, and there is indeed a substantial amount of power in a lightning strike.

A typical lightning strike delivers enough energy to power a residential house for about two days.

That means that even the Empire State Building, which is struck by lightning about 100 times a year, wouldn’t be able to keep a house running all year round on lightning power alone.

Wind farms are one of the major generators of electricity.

흐름상 어색한 문장은 “Wind farms are one of the major generators of electricity.”이다.
글은 번개에서 전력을 얻는 것이 비현실적이라는 내용인데, 이 문장은 풍력 발전 단지가 주요 발전원이라는 별개의 사실이라 번개의 전력량을 따지는 흐름을 끊는다.
“On the face of it, it makes sense; …”는 번개가 전기이니 그럴듯해 보인다며 글의 화제를 여는 문장으로 자연스럽다.
“A typical lightning strike delivers enough energy …”는 번개 한 번의 에너지를 가정집 약 이틀분으로 구체화해 자연스럽다.
“That means that even the Empire State Building, …”은 앞의 수치에서 연간 전력으로도 부족하다는 결론을 끌어내 자연스럽다.