다음 글에서 Locke의 주장으로 가장 적절한 것은?In Locke's… | [9급 지방직 영어] 17년 3회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

다음 글에서 Locke의 주장으로 가장 적절한 것은?
In Locke's defense of private property, the significant point is what happens when we mix our labor with God's land. We add value to the land by working it; we make fertile what once lay fallow. In this sense, it is our labor that is the source of the value, or the added value, of the land. This value-creating power of my labor makes it right that I own the piece of land which I have made valuable by clearing it, the well I have made full by digging it, the animals I have raised and fattened. With Locke, Homo faber—the man of labor—becomes for the first time in the history of political thought a central rather than peripheral figure. In Locke's world, status and honor still flowed to the aristocrats, who were entitled to vast landholdings but were letting history pass them by precisely because new economic realities were in the process of shifting wealth to a bourgeoisie that actually created value by work. In time, Locke's elevation of the significance of labor was bound to appeal to the rising bourgeoisie.

Ownership of property comes from labor.

Labor is the most important ideal to aristocratic society.

The accumulation of private property is a source of happiness.

A smooth transition to bourgeois society is essential for social progress.

Locke의 주장으로 가장 적절한 것은 "Ownership of property comes from labor."(재산의 소유권은 노동에서 나온다)이다.
본문은 노동이 땅에 가치를 더하며, "This value-creating power of my labor makes it right that I own the piece of land"(내 노동의 가치 창출력이 그 땅을 소유하는 것을 정당하게 만든다)고 설명한다.
"Labor is the most important ideal to aristocratic society."는 귀족은 지위와 명예를 누렸을 뿐 노동으로 가치를 만든 것은 부르주아였다는 본문과 맞지 않는다.
"The accumulation of private property is a source of happiness."는 행복에 대한 언급이 본문에 없다.
"A smooth transition to bourgeois society is essential for social progress."는 Locke의 주장으로 제시되지 않았다.