다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?It is easy to look … | [9급 지방직 영어] 17년 3회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?
It is easy to look at the diverse things people produce and to describe their differences. Obviously a poem is not a mathematical formula, and a novel is not an experiment in genetics. Composers clearly use a different language from that of visual artists, and chemists combine very different things than do playwrights. To characterize people by the different things they make, however, is to miss the universality of how they create. For at the level of the creative process, scientists, artists, mathematicians, composers, writers, and sculptors use a common set of what we call "tools for thinking," including emotional feelings, visual images, bodily sensations, reproducible patterns, and analogies. And all imaginative thinkers learn to translate ideas generated by these subjective thinking tools into public languages to express their insights, which can then give rise to new ideas in others' minds.

obstacles to imaginative thinking

the difference between art and science

the commonality of the creative process

distinctive features of various professions

글의 주제는 "the commonality of the creative process"(창조 과정의 공통성)이다.
필자는 결과물의 차이로 사람을 규정하면 "the universality of how they create"(창조 방식의 보편성)를 놓친다고 하며, 과학자·예술가·작곡가 등이 공통된 "tools for thinking"(사고 도구)을 쓴다고 주장한다.
"obstacles to imaginative thinking"(상상적 사고의 장애물)은 본문에서 다루지 않는다.
"the difference between art and science"(예술과 과학의 차이)는 도입부의 소재일 뿐 필자는 오히려 공통점을 강조한다.
"distinctive features of various professions"(여러 직업의 특징)은 공통성이라는 요지와 반대된다.