글의 흐름상 가장 어색한 것은?A story that is on the… | [9급 지방직 영어] 17년 3회차 기출문제 상세 페이지

글의 흐름상 가장 어색한 것은?
A story that is on the cutting edge of modern science began in an isolated part of northern Sweden in the 19th century. ①This area of the country had unpredictable harvests through the first half of the century. In years that the harvest failed, the population went hungry. However, the good years were very good. ②The same people who went hungry during bad harvests overate significantly during the good years. A Swedish scientist wondered about the long-term effects of these eating patterns. He studied the harvest and health records of the area. He was astonished by what he found. ③Boys who overate during the good years produced children and grandchildren who died about six years earlier than the children and grandchildren of those who had very little to eat. Other scientists found the same result for girls. ④Both boys and girls benefited greatly from the harvests of the good years. The scientists were forced to conclude that just one reason of overeating could have a negative impact that continued for generations.

①

②

③

④

흐름상 어색한 문장은 "Both boys and girls benefited greatly from the harvests of the good years."(남녀 모두 풍년의 수확으로 큰 혜택을 보았다)이다.
글은 풍년에 과식한 아이들의 자손이 약 6년 일찍 사망했다는 연구 결과를 소개하고, 과식이 여러 세대에 걸친 부정적 영향을 미친다고 결론짓는다. 풍년의 혜택을 강조하는 문장은 이 흐름과 반대된다.
북부 스웨덴의 수확이 예측 불가능했다는 문장은 흉년·풍년 배경을 제시한다.
흉년에 굶주린 사람들이 풍년에 과식했다는 문장은 연구 대상인 식습관을 설명한다.
과식한 소년들의 자손이 일찍 사망했다는 문장은 연구 결과로서 결론과 이어진다.