Extensive lists of microwave oven models and styles along with candid customer reviews and price ranges are available at appliance comparison websites.
밑줄 친 "candid"(솔직한, 숨김없는)와 의미가 가장 가까운 것은 "frank"(솔직한)이다.
가전 비교 웹사이트에서 제품 목록과 함께 "candid customer reviews"(솔직한 고객 후기)를 볼 수 있다는 문맥이다.
- "logical" — 논리적인
- "implicit" — 암시적인, 내포된
- "passionate" — 열정적인
It had been known for a long time that Yellowstone was volcanic in nature and the one thing about volcanoes is that they are generally conspicuous.
밑줄 친 "conspicuous"(눈에 잘 띄는, 뚜렷한)와 의미가 가장 가까운 것은 "noticeable"(눈에 잘 띄는)이다.
옐로스톤이 화산 지대라는 것은 오래전부터 알려져 있었고, 화산의 특징은 대체로 "generally conspicuous"(대개 눈에 잘 띈다)는 것이라는 문맥이다.
- "passive" — 수동적인
- "vaporous" — 증기 같은, 흐릿한
- "dangerous" — 위험한
He's the best person to tell you how to get there because he knows the city inside out.
밑줄 친 "inside out"(속속들이, 완전히)와 의미가 가장 가까운 것은 "thoroughly"(철저히, 속속들이)이다.
그가 도시를 "knows the city inside out"(속속들이 알고 있다) 하므로 길을 알려 줄 최적의 사람이라는 문맥이다.
- "eventually" — 결국
- "culturally" — 문화적으로
- "tentatively" — 잠정적으로, 머뭇거리며
All along the route were thousands of homespun attempts to pay tribute to the team, including messages etched in cardboard, snow and construction paper.
밑줄 친 "pay tribute to"(~에 경의를 표하다)와 의미가 가장 가까운 것은 "honor"(경의를 표하다, 기리다)이다.
경로를 따라 팀에 "pay tribute to" 하려는 수제 시도, 즉 판지·눈·색종이에 새긴 메시지가 수천 개 있었다는 문맥이다.
- "compose" — 구성하다, 작곡하다
- "publicize" — 홍보하다, 알리다
- "join" — 합류하다, 가입하다
"The intensity of a color is related to how much gray the color contains."가 어법상 옳은 문장이다.
전치사 to 뒤에 간접의문문(의문사 how much + 명사 + 주어 + 동사)이 명사절로 쓰여 "how much gray the color contains"(그 색이 회색을 얼마나 포함하는지)의 어순이 바르다.
- "busier than those of a small city" — 비교 대상 "The traffic"이 단수 불가산명사이므로 지시대명사는 those가 아니라 that으로 수일치해야 한다.
- "when I'll be lying" — 시간 부사절에서는 미래 대신 현재시제를 쓰므로 "when I am lying"이 되어야 한다.
- "only the wealth ate them" — "부자들"을 뜻하려면 'the + 형용사 = 복수 보통명사' 규칙에 따라 "the wealthy"가 되어야 한다. wealth는 '부(富)'라는 추상명사다.
→Several problems have raised due to the new members.
→The committee commanded that construction of the building cease.
→They had to fight against winds that will blow over 40 miles an hour.
→The seeds of most plants are survived by harsh weather.
"The committee commanded that construction of the building cease."가 우리말을 가장 잘 옮긴 문장이다.
명령·요구 동사 command 뒤 that절에는 (should) + 동사원형을 쓰므로, 주어가 단수 construction이어도 "cease"(중단되다)가 옳다.
- "Several problems have raised" — raise는 목적어가 필요한 타동사이므로 '생기다'는 자동사 arise를 써서 "have arisen"이 되어야 한다.
- "winds that will blow over 40 miles an hour" — 과거의 일(had to fight)이므로 관계절도 "blew"나 "were blowing"처럼 과거 시제로 맞춰야 한다.
- "The seeds of most plants are survived by harsh weather" — survive는 '~에도 살아남다'라는 타동사로 능동태를 써야 하므로 "survive harsh weather"가 되어야 한다.
→Human beings quickly adapt themselves to the environment.
→She had no choice but to give up her goal because of the accident.
→The company prohibited him from promoting to vice-president.
→It is easy to assemble and take apart the toy car.
"The company prohibited him from promoting to vice-president."가 잘못 옮긴 문장이다.
그는 승진'되는' 대상이므로 prohibit A from -ing 구문에서 동명사의 수동형을 써서 "from being promoted to vice-president"가 되어야 한다.
- "Human beings quickly adapt themselves to the environment" — adapt oneself to(~에 적응하다)에서 주어와 목적어가 같으므로 재귀대명사 themselves가 옳다.
- "She had no choice but to give up her goal" — have no choice but to + 동사원형(~할 수밖에 없다) 구문이 바르게 쓰였다.
- "It is easy to assemble and take apart the toy car" — 가주어 It, 진주어 to부정사 구문이며 assemble과 take apart가 병렬로 the toy car를 목적어로 취한다.
Listening to somebody else's ideas is the one way to know whether the story you believe about the world—as well as about yourself and your place in it—remains intact. We all need to examine our beliefs, air them out and let them breathe. Hearing what other people have to say, especially about concepts we regard as foundational, is like opening a window in our minds and in our hearts. Speaking up is important. Yet to speak up without listening is like banging pots and pans together: even if it gets you attention, it's not going to get you respect. There are three prerequisites for conversation to be meaningful: 1. You have to know what you're talking about, meaning that you have an original point and are not echoing a worn-out, hand-me-down or pre-fab argument; 2. You respect the people with whom you're speaking and are authentically willing to treat them courteously even if you disagree with their positions; 3. You have to be both smart and informed enough to listen to what the opposition says while handling your own perspective on the topic with uninterrupted good humor and discernment.
글의 요지는 "We need to listen and speak up in order to communicate well."(잘 소통하려면 듣는 것과 말하는 것이 모두 필요하다)이다.
필자는 "Speaking up is important. Yet to speak up without listening is like banging pots and pans together"(말하는 것은 중요하지만 듣지 않고 말하는 것은 냄비를 두드리는 것과 같다)라며 경청과 발언을 함께 강조하고, 의미 있는 대화의 전제 조건으로 상대 존중과 경청을 든다.
- "We should be more determined to persuade others." — 남을 설득하려는 의지는 글에서 다루지 않는다.
- "We are reluctant to change our beliefs about the world we see." — 글은 오히려 신념을 점검하고 "air them out"(바깥 공기를 쐬게) 해야 한다고 권한다.
- "We hear only what we choose and attempt to ignore different opinions." — 다른 의견을 들어야 한다는 글의 주장과 반대된다.
The future may be uncertain, but some things are undeniable: climate change, shifting demographics, geopolitics. The only guarantee is that there will be changes, both wonderful and terrible. It's worth considering how artists will respond to these changes, as well as what purpose art serves, now and in the future. Reports suggest that by 2040 the impacts of human-caused climate change will be inescapable, making it the big issue at the centre of art and life in 20 years' time. Artists in the future will wrestle with the possibilities of the post-human and post-Anthropocene—artificial intelligence, human colonies in outer space and potential doom. The identity politics seen in art around the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements will grow as environmentalism, border politics and migration come even more sharply into focus. Art will become increasingly diverse and might not 'look like art' as we expect. In the future, once we've become weary of our lives being visible online for all to see and our privacy has been all but lost, anonymity may be more desirable than fame. Instead of thousands, or millions, of likes and followers, we will be starved for authenticity and connection. Art could, in turn, become more collective and experiential, rather than individual.
글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은 "What will art look like in the future?"(미래에 예술은 어떤 모습일까?)이다.
필자는 "how artists will respond to these changes, as well as what purpose art serves, now and in the future"를 고찰하며, 예술이 "increasingly diverse"해지고 "more collective and experiential"해질 것이라고 전망한다.
- "How will global warming affect our lives?" — 기후 변화는 미래 예술의 주제가 될 변화의 하나로 언급될 뿐이다.
- "How will artificial intelligence influence the environment?" — 인공지능은 미래 예술가가 다룰 가능성의 예시일 뿐이며 환경에 미치는 영향은 다루지 않는다.
- "What changes will be made because of political movements?" — #MeToo 등 정치 운동은 예술 속 정체성 정치의 예로만 나온다.
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Supreme Court rulings, citing this amendment, have upheld the right of states to regulate firearms. However, in a 2008 decision confirming an individual right to keep and bear arms, the court struck down Washington, D.C. laws that banned handguns and required those in the home to be locked or disassembled. A number of gun advocates consider ownership a birthright and an essential part of the nation's heritage. The United States, with less than 5 percent of the world's population, has about 35~50 percent of the world's civilian-owned guns, according to a 2007 report by the Switzerland-based Small Arms Survey. It ranks number one in firearms per capita. The United States also has the highest homicide-by-firearm rate among the world's most developed nations. But many gun-rights proponents say these statistics do not indicate a cause-and-effect relationship and note that the rates of gun homicide and other gun crimes in the United States have dropped since highs in the early 1990's.
글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은 "Gun crimes in the U.S. have steadily increased over the last three decades."이다.
글의 마지막에 미국의 총기 살인과 기타 총기 범죄 비율이 "have dropped since highs in the early 1990's"(1990년대 초 정점 이후 감소했다)라고 했으므로 꾸준히 증가했다는 진술과 반대된다.
- "In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Washington, D.C. laws banning handguns." — "in a 2008 decision … the court struck down Washington, D.C. laws that banned handguns"와 일치한다.
- "Many gun advocates claim that owning guns is a natural-born right." — "A number of gun advocates consider ownership a birthright"와 일치한다.
- "Among the most developed nations, the U.S. has the highest rate of gun homicides." — "the highest homicide-by-firearm rate among the world's most developed nations"와 일치한다.
B:You have to pay by next week.
B:No, it's small enough to take on the plane.
B:I'll pick you up at your office at 8:30.
B:I couldn't have done it without you.
A:"I won the prize in a cooking contest." — B:"I couldn't have done it without you."가 가장 어색한 대화다.
요리 대회에서 상을 탔다는 말에는 축하를 해야 하는데, B의 "I couldn't have done it without you"(당신 없이는 해내지 못했을 거예요)는 상을 받은 당사자가 할 감사의 말이라 응답으로 맞지 않는다.
- "When is the payment due?" — 납부 기한을 묻자 "by next week"(다음 주까지)라고 답해 자연스럽다.
- "Should I check this baggage in?" — 짐을 부쳐야 하는지 묻자 기내에 들고 탈 만큼 작다고 답해 자연스럽다.
- "When and where shall we meet?" — 만날 시간과 장소를 묻자 8시 30분에 사무실로 데리러 가겠다고 답해 자연스럽다.
A: Thank you for calling the Royal Point Hotel Reservations Department. My name is Sam. How may I help you?
B: Hello, I'd like to book a room.
A: We offer two room types: the deluxe room and the luxury suite.
B: ______________________?
A: For one, the suite is very large. In addition to a bedroom, it has a kitchen, living room and dining room.
B: It sounds expensive.
A: Well, it's $200 more per night.
B: In that case, I'll go with the deluxe room.
빈칸에 들어갈 말은 "What's the difference between them"(둘의 차이가 무엇인가요)이다.
직원이 두 객실 유형을 소개한 뒤 빈칸 다음에 "For one, the suite is very large"(우선 스위트룸은 매우 넓다)라며 두 객실의 차이점을 설명하므로 차이를 묻는 질문이 와야 한다.
- "Do you need anything else" — 손님 B가 직원에게 할 말이 아니며 이어지는 객실 설명과도 맞지 않는다.
- "May I have the room number" — 아직 예약 전이라 객실 번호를 물을 상황이 아니다.
- "Are pets allowed in the rooms" — 이어지는 답이 반려동물이 아니라 스위트룸의 크기와 구성에 관한 것이다.
Advocates of homeschooling believe that children learn better when they are in a secure, loving environment. Many psychologists see the home as the most natural learning environment, and originally the home was the classroom, long before schools were established. Parents who homeschool argue that they can monitor their children's education and give them the attention that is lacking in a traditional school setting. Students can also pick and choose what to study and when to study, thus enabling them to learn at their own pace. (A), critics of homeschooling say that children who are not in the classroom miss out on learning important social skills because they have little interaction with their peers. Several studies, though, have shown that the home-educated children appear to do just as well in terms of social and emotional development as other students, having spent more time in the comfort and security of their home, with guidance from parents who care about their welfare. (B), many critics of homeschooling have raised concerns about the ability of parents to teach their kids effectively.
(A)에는 "In contrast", (B)에는 "In spite of this"가 들어가는 것이 가장 적절하다.
(A) 앞은 홈스쿨링 옹호자의 장점, 뒤는 "critics of homeschooling say"로 비판자의 반론이므로 대조의 연결어가 필요하다. (B) 앞은 홈스쿨링 아동의 사회·정서 발달이 뒤지지 않는다는 연구 결과, 뒤는 그럼에도 비판자들이 부모의 교육 능력을 우려한다는 내용이므로 양보의 연결어가 맞다.
- "Therefore, Nevertheless" — (A) 앞뒤가 인과가 아니라 대조 관계이므로 "Therefore"가 맞지 않는다.
- "Therefore, Contrary to that" — (A)의 "Therefore"가 맞지 않고, (B)의 "Contrary to that"도 앞 내용과 정반대 사실을 제시하는 표현이라 양보의 흐름에 어색하다.
- "In contrast, Furthermore" — (B) 앞뒤는 첨가가 아니라 양보 관계이므로 "Furthermore"가 맞지 않는다.
For many people, work has become an obsession. It has caused burnout, unhappiness and gender inequity, as people struggle to find time for children or passions or pets or any sort of life besides what they do for a paycheck. But increasingly, younger workers are pushing back. More of them expect and demand flexibility—paid leave for a new baby, say, and generous vacation time, along with daily things, like the ability to work remotely, come in late or leave early, or make time for exercise or meditation. The rest of their lives happens on their phones, not tied to a certain place or time—why should work be any different?
글의 주제는 "increasing call for flexibility at work"(직장에서의 유연성에 대한 요구 증가)이다.
일에 매몰된 삶에 대해 젊은 노동자들이 "pushing back"(반발)하며 "expect and demand flexibility"(유연성을 기대하고 요구한다)—출산 유급휴가, 원격 근무, 출퇴근 시간 조정 등—라는 내용이 중심이다.
- "ways to increase your paycheck" — 급여를 늘리는 방법은 다루지 않는다.
- "obsession for reducing inequity" — 불평등은 일에 대한 집착이 낳은 결과의 하나로 언급될 뿐이다.
- "advantages of a life with long vacations" — 넉넉한 휴가는 요구되는 유연성의 한 예일 뿐이다.
Past research has shown that experiencing frequent psychological stress can be a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a condition that affects almost half of those aged 20 years and older in the United States.
(A) Does this mean, though, that people who drive on a daily basis are set to develop heart problems, or is there a simple way of easing the stress of driving?
(B) According to a new study, there is. The researchers noted that listening to music while driving helps relieve the stress that affects heart health.
(C) One source of frequent stress is driving, either due to the stressors associated with heavy traffic or the anxiety that often accompanies inexperienced drivers.
이어질 글의 순서는 (C)-(A)-(B)가 가장 적절하다.
주어진 글이 잦은 스트레스가 심혈관 질환의 위험 요인이라고 하자, (C)가 "One source of frequent stress is driving"으로 운전을 스트레스원으로 제시한다. (A)는 그렇다면 운전자는 심장 문제를 겪게 되는지, 아니면 "a simple way of easing the stress of driving"이 있는지 묻고, (B)가 "there is"라고 답하며 음악 감상을 제시한다.
- (A)로 시작하는 순서 — (A)의 "the stress of driving"은 운전이 스트레스원이라는 (C)의 내용이 먼저 나와야 성립한다.
- (B)로 시작하는 순서 — (B)의 "there is"는 (A)의 질문에 대한 답이므로 (A) 앞에 올 수 없다.
- (C) 다음 (B)가 오는 순서 — (A)의 질문 없이 "there is"가 나오게 되어 연결이 끊긴다.
When the brain perceives a threat in the immediate surroundings, it initiates a complex string of events in the body. It sends electrical messages to various glands, organs that release chemical hormones into the bloodstream. Blood quickly carries these hormones to other organs that are then prompted to do various things. ①The adrenal glands above the kidneys, for example, pump out adrenaline, the body's stress hormone. ②Adrenaline travels all over the body doing things such as widening the eyes to be on the lookout for signs of danger, pumping the heart faster to keep blood and extra hormones flowing, and tensing the skeletal muscles so they are ready to lash out at or run from the threat. ③The whole process is called the fight-or-flight response, because it prepares the body to either battle or run for its life. ④Humans consciously control their glands to regulate the release of various hormones. Once the response is initiated, ignoring it is impossible, because hormones cannot be reasoned with.
글의 흐름상 어색한 문장은 "Humans consciously control their glands to regulate the release of various hormones."이다.
글은 위협을 감지하면 뇌가 자동으로 일으키는 투쟁-도피 반응을 설명하며 마지막에 "ignoring it is impossible, because hormones cannot be reasoned with"(호르몬은 이성으로 통제할 수 없다)라고 한다. 인간이 의식적으로 분비샘을 조절한다는 문장은 이와 모순된다.
- "The adrenal glands … pump out adrenaline" — 호르몬이 다른 기관을 자극한다는 앞 문장의 구체적 예시다.
- "Adrenaline travels all over the body …" — 아드레날린이 눈·심장·근육에 작용하는 과정을 이어서 설명한다.
- "The whole process is called the fight-or-flight response …" — 앞서 설명한 과정 전체를 명명하며 정리한다.
It was then he remembered his experience with the glass flask, and just as quickly, he imagined that a special coating might be applied to a glass windshield to keep it from shattering.
In 1903 the French chemist, Edouard Benedictus, dropped a glass flask one day on a hard floor and broke it. ( ① ) However, to the astonishment of the chemist, the flask did not shatter, but still retained most of its original shape. ( ② ) When he examined the flask he found that it contained a film coating inside, a residue remaining from a solution of collodion that the flask had contained. ( ③ ) He made a note of this unusual phenomenon, but thought no more of it until several weeks later when he read stories in the newspapers about people in automobile accidents who were badly hurt by flying windshield glass. ( ④ ) Not long thereafter, he succeeded in producing the world's first sheet of safety glass.
주어진 문장은 "flying windshield glass." 다음, "Not long thereafter" 앞에 들어가는 것이 가장 적절하다.
주어진 문장의 "It was then"(바로 그때)은 신문에서 깨진 앞유리로 다친 사고 기사를 읽은 시점을 가리키며, 그때 플라스크 경험을 떠올려 코팅을 생각했기에 뒤이어 "he succeeded in producing the world's first sheet of safety glass"로 이어진다.
- 플라스크를 떨어뜨려 깨뜨린 직후 — 아직 플라스크가 산산조각 나지 않은 사실도 확인하기 전이다.
- 플라스크가 원형을 유지했다는 문장 직후 — 코팅막을 발견하기 전이라 코팅 아이디어가 나올 수 없다.
- 콜로디온 막을 발견한 직후 — 이어지는 "He made a note … but thought no more of it"(더 생각하지 않았다)과 모순된다.
Dubrovnik, Croatia, is a mess. Because its main attraction is its seaside Old Town surrounded by 80-foot medieval walls, this Dalmatian Coast town does not absorb visitors very well. And when cruise ships are docked here, a legion of tourists turn Old Town into a miasma of tank-top-clad tourists marching down the town's limestone-blanketed streets. Yes, the city of Dubrovnik has been proactive in trying to curb cruise ship tourism, but nothing will save Old Town from the perpetual swarm of tourists. To make matters worse, the lure of making extra money has inspired many homeowners in Old Town to turn over their places to Airbnb, making the walled portion of town one giant hotel. You want an “authentic” Dubrovnik experience in Old Town, just like a local? You're not going to find it here. Ever.
글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은 Dubrovnik 시가 크루즈 여행을 확대하려고 노력해 왔다는 진술이다.
글에는 "the city of Dubrovnik has been proactive in trying to curb cruise ship tourism"이라 하여, 시는 크루즈 관광을 "curb"(억제하다)하려고 적극적으로 노력해 왔다.
- Old Town이 80피트 중세 성벽에 둘러싸여 있다는 진술 — "surrounded by 80-foot medieval walls"와 일치한다.
- 크루즈 정박 시 여행객이 거리를 활보한다는 진술 — "when cruise ships are docked here, a legion of tourists … marching down the town's … streets"와 일치한다.
- 많은 집이 여행객 숙소로 바뀌었다는 진술 — "many homeowners in Old Town to turn over their places to Airbnb"와 일치한다.
When an organism is alive, it takes in carbon dioxide from the air around it. Most of that carbon dioxide is made of carbon-12, but a tiny portion consists of carbon-14. So the living organism always contains a very small amount of radioactive carbon, carbon-14. A detector next to the living organism would record radiation given off by the carbon-14 in the organism. When the organism dies, it no longer takes in carbon dioxide. No new carbon-14 is added, and the old carbon-14 slowly decays into nitrogen. The amount of carbon-14 slowly (A) as time goes on. Over time, less and less radiation from carbon-14 is produced. The amount of carbon-14 radiation detected for an organism is a measure, therefore, of how long the organism has been (B). This method of determining the age of an organism is called carbon-14 dating. The decay of carbon-14 allows archaeologists to find the age of once-living materials. Measuring the amount of radiation remaining indicates the approximate age.
(A)에는 "decreases", (B)에는 "dead"가 들어가는 것이 가장 적절하다.
생물이 죽으면 새 탄소-14가 더해지지 않고 기존 탄소-14가 붕괴하므로 그 양은 시간이 지날수록 줄어든다("less and less radiation"). 따라서 남은 방사선 양은 생물이 죽은 지 얼마나 되었는지를 나타낸다.
- "increases, alive" — 새 탄소-14가 추가되지 않고 붕괴만 일어나므로 양이 늘 수 없고, 측정되는 것도 살아 있던 기간이 아니다.
- "decreases, productive" — (A)는 맞지만 측정되는 것은 생산적이었던 기간이 아니라 죽은 뒤 경과한 시간이다.
- "increases, inactive" — 탄소-14의 양은 붕괴로 줄어들므로 (A)부터 맞지 않는다.
All creatures, past and present, either have gone or will go extinct. Yet, as each species vanished over the past 3.8-billion-year history of life on Earth, new ones inevitably appeared to replace them or to exploit newly emerging resources. From only a few very simple organisms, a great number of complex, multicellular forms evolved over this immense period. The origin of new species, which the nineteenth-century English naturalist Charles Darwin once referred to as “the mystery of mysteries,” is the natural process of speciation responsible for generating this remarkable __________ with whom humans share the planet. Although taxonomists presently recognize some 1.5 million living species, the actual number is possibly closer to 10 million. Recognizing the biological status of this multitude requires a clear understanding of what constitutes a species, which is no easy task given that evolutionary biologists have yet to agree on a universally acceptable definition.
빈칸에 들어갈 말은 "diversity of living creatures"(생물의 다양성)이다.
단순한 몇몇 생물에서 "a great number of complex, multicellular forms evolved"했고, 빈칸 뒤에서 현재 인정된 종이 약 150만, 실제로는 1,000만에 가까울 수 있다고 하므로 종 분화가 만들어 낸 생물의 다양성이 빈칸에 맞다.
- "technique of biologists" — 종 분화는 자연 과정이며 생물학자의 기법과 무관하다.
- "inventory of extinct organisms" — 빈칸은 "with whom humans share the planet"(인간과 지구를 함께 쓰는) 현존 생물을 가리키므로 멸종 생물이 아니다.
- "collection of endangered species" — 멸종 위기종은 글에서 다루지 않는다.